Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Zais on Early Childhood Education (Part 2)

REGGIE'S QUESTION ASKED TO MICK ZAIS:

Dr. Zais,

The educational expectations for grade-school students continue to rise almost every year or every few years. These increased thresholds have a tendency to cause school districts to push down academic standards into the younger grades (like pre-kindergarten). Much research has shown that "hurrying" the child academically like that is not developmentally appropriate for them and does not most consistently ensure later school success for all types of children.

If elected as SC Superintendent of Education, what is your plan to increase the level of developmentally appropriate instruction and curriculum implementation in pre kindergarten and Kindergarten to ensure that students are being held only to goals and experiences that are suited to their learning and development and challenging enough to promote their progress and interest?

Dear Dr. Williams,

Thank you for contacting me and your wishes
for my success in my campaign for State Superintendent of Education. I
apologize
for not responding sooner; my campaign schedule and family
schedule have been
very full, so I haven’t had a good opportunity to pen a
thoughtful
response.

In regards to your question: I
think it is
critical that every child receive instruction that is both
developmentally and
academically appropriate for them. This is
especially true for preschool
children. You have rightly pointed
out that sooner isn’t always
better for children. I have spoken
repeatedly about how setting up a
system that all children enter at the same
time and are expected to exit at the
same time is unrealistic and
detrimental to our students. Students grow
and mature at varying
rates. Artificially holding some students back and
hurrying others is
bad for the students and bad for our
state.

Mandating a
statewide full-day kindergarten program
for all four year olds would
exacerbate a problem you are already observing.
Any statewide
education program will be pushed to have statewide, academic
standards based
assessment. The majority of a young child’s day should not
be driven
by the institutional testing goals of the K-12 system. Children
need a
sense of security and self at these youngest ages. These are
developed
in relationships, not institutions, in my opinion.

At the
same
time, and has been noted by the courts, that some students come into their
formal school years with significant cognitive development deficits that can
be
linked to a lack of exposure to language, print, time concepts and number
concepts. Frequently, these children also lack consistent nutrition
and
health care. Our state developed First Steps in order to
holistically
address these needs of pre-kindergarten children. Local
boards assess the
local needs and resources and then develop plans to meet
the needs of the
communities they serve. In my opinion, this is the
appropriate way to
manage meeting the needs of our youngest children who are
not receiving basic
needs.

I support the current
structure of separation between
pre-K and k-12 standards and
oversight. K-12 should not have mission
creep that extends its
master plan from the cradle through
college.

Thank you for
writing and for all you do for the children
under your
care.

Sincerely,

Mick Zais


So what do you think?

6 comments:

Mike H. said...

Three cheers for Mr. Zais. I'm especially impressed to see that he understands the SC Dept. of Education should not take over First Steps. First Steps is doing well on its own and given the past history of politicization of the Superintendent's office, I am not interested in a politician who would manipulate First Steps for their political agenda. The future of our kids are too important to be left to the politicians!

Reginald Harrison Williams said...

Mike,

Thank you for your response.

Keeping the SC DOE and First Steps apart is an interesting concept.

On one hand, First Steps is still doing viably well. My preK classroom when I was in the public schools was funded by first steps. The program is admirable.

On the other hand, keeping too many separate early childhood entitites tends to create possible conflicting goals.

First Steps is focused more on holistic school readiness delievered in a comprehensivie way a la Head Start (just with state funds). The focus is often aimed at reaching this goal from a "Child Care Quality" (private day cares) standpoint. Where, though, does that leave the public school preK programs? They are focused on the same ideas, but they are rooted in increasing the academic side (as opposed to the other domains).

Either keeping First Steps separate or having it under the auspice of the SC DOE would work as long as they both have collaborative agreements that keep them working in tandem rather than overstepping each other's territory or retreading already covered ground.

Wonderful Post,
Reggie:)

Gemma said...

These articles are so wonderful. It's nice to get first hand information from experts about childhood early education.

I'm not an expert by far but I want to emphasis this with my children.

Reginald Harrison Williams said...

Gemma,

Thank you for comments. I'm so sorry that I am getting back to you so late:)

R:)

julianjones said...

Thank you for your excellent post.Well I am very new for your site but believe me it's very nice specially it's discussion.Great work keep it up.

Boarding School UK

Reginald Harrison Williams said...

My Pleasure, Ms. Jones:)

I appreciate your kind words

Let me know if I can help anymore.

Keep Smiling,
Reggie:)